You have all kinds of data, but why are answers so hard to find?
Ask any exec what they want from data, and you'll hear the same thing: "Just tell me what's working and what's not."
But what you see instead in many organizations are:
- Siloed, function specific dashboards
- Conflicting reports across different parts of the organization
- Significant delays waiting for middlemen to initiate complex data pulls other begin with
It's not for lack of data. Most organizations have plenty of that (they might even argue have too much).
The real issue? The way data is stored doesn't match how real human beings think.
Here's an example that might resonate.
Let's say you want to know:
"What's our cost per acquisition by campaign?"
Seems simple on paper.
But inside the ingredients of an organizational sausage, that can mean pulling spend from one system, conversions from another, stitching IDs, cleaning formats, and praying nothing broke. Frustratingly, most tools weren't built for that kind of question. They were built for structured queries, not human thinking.
So how could Generative AI help?
With translation.
One intriguing value of Generative AI is that it can sit between your messy backend of data table spaghetti and your business brain.
Here's how:
1. It can allow you to ask questions rather than build dashboards
You say: "Show me CAC by region last quarter." It figures out:
- Where the spend data lives
- Where conversions are tracked
- How to calculate what you really meant You don't have to know table names. You just have to ask.
2. It can connect the dots
AI can suggest how to join data across systems even if they weren't designed to talk. "Looks like object.email links CRM to billing. Want to use that?" It's not magic. But that kind of diagnosis can save hours (and a few headaches).
3. It can make exploration much more approachable
Instead of getting stuck with whatever chart someone built last quarter, you can go deeper: "Break that out by campaign type." "Show me month-over-month change." "Only for accounts over $100k." It's like having a data analyst in the room only faster.
But there's a lot that AI still can't fix
- If your data's a mess, AI just amplifies the chaos.
- If no one agrees on what "customer" means, AI can't help.
- If people don't trust the numbers, tech won't solve that.
But if your foundations are halfway decent, AI can accelerate clarity in ways that weren't possible even a year ago.
If you're leading a team and want to make this real, start here:
- Ditch the dashboard mindset. Start with questions.
- Define key business terms. Even if it's messy.
- Make your data easier to find. Tag it. Document it.
- Test conversational AI tools. In a safe, focused use case.
You already have the data.
Now you can finally get the answers.
Generative AI won't replace your data team but it might just make them (and you) far more effective.
Related
- Chat Lets Us Rethink Forms and That's a Bigger Deal Than It SoundsForms were a workaround for software that couldn't listen. AI conversations can replace many of them, with the structured data moving behind the scenes.
- You Don't Have an AI Problem. You Have a Sequencing Problem.AI won't fix product-market fit. Why founders get more from AI as an operating habit than as a feature, and how to get the sequence right.
- How to Tell If Your Problem Is Actually a Good Fit for AITen signs a problem is a good fit for AI, from building an AI legal bill review product: unstructured inputs, high volume, inconsistent judgment, and more.